@Transflux this is really interesting.

Two big things I'm wondering:

* What do those numbers mean in practical terms? Are the differences very significant in reality?

* How much energy is used in compiling compiled languages like C, or those with runtimes like Java or C# -- especially with a team of developers all compiling every so often? I didn't see information on that, though it seems likely the languages could mostly balance out when that consideration is factored in.

@michelamarie
Practicaly they can't say anything cuz every practical case is different. The more complex or repeated a program runs the more significant the difference will be.

num 2. Is a really good point, also depends on the usage. It has been a while since I compiled 😁. But I was doing a lot of art stuff with processing (worst name for a programing language...tho it's actually just java) a lot, a lot of compilations for details like a color or something.

@michelamarie anyway and so there are some c++ compiler configs which a smart and can skip files, no?
So probably during development using scripts use less power.

I was wondering about cython :). And the energy of ai. Training a neural network and recognizing faces.... Just to slash surveillance with its wastefulness.

@michelamarie the research is fascinating -and I also want to run flask on a pi powered by the sun hitting my balcony

Sign in to participate in the conversation
Mastodon

The social network of the future: No ads, no corporate surveillance, ethical design, and decentralization! Own your data with Mastodon!