"yes, we love open source, but we don't know how to make money out of Amazon so we want it not to be open source but pretend it is"

The end of the story seems to be that it's just not possible to make an open source license significantly better than the AGPL for now because there's always potential loopholes when trying to define online stuff. Either you adapt your business model to open source, or do what MongoDB is trying to do and adapt the idea of open source to your business model - which the OSI finds unacceptable
lists.opensource.org/pipermail
lists.opensource.org/pipermail

Follow

@espectalll At first few glances, this doesn't seem like a bad thing? Just asserting copyleft harder.

Β· Web Β· 1 Β· 0 Β· 0

@anjum The problem is how you actually make that copyleft. You can't just set specific terms by purpose, trying to keep it all copyleft seems to always leave loopholes (you can always run code in more convoluted ways that get out of a definition), and to get out of that issue you would have to include software that's not directly related to get copylefted

Sign in to participate in the conversation
Mastodon

mstdn.io is one of the instance in the fediverse. We're an open-minded generalistic instance. Learn more here!