#GMail is harmful to e-mail ecosystem; its antispam blocking policy matches too many valid messages as spam.
It blocked LastPass email leak warning email, because it contained "a link" to a leaked site.
It blocked an e-mail from goverment agency addressed directly to me.
It discriminates all non-gmail servers, and it's pretty much impossible to own a private SMTP server these days, because GMail will classify everything as spam.
It's not how e-mail should work.
Consider dropping GMail.
@antekone Another horrible related thing that's starting to happen a lot is that many email sysadmins are getting lazy when it comes to spam set up and simply rejecting all incoming messages from any mail servers that aren't google, ms etc which helps to cement their monopoly even more 😞
@lschuermann @antekone I've been running my own mail server for about 15yr now, and I'm finding that sending to G,MS etc servers is actually working very well nowadays, but you do have to ensure you're config is rock solid including rDNS, IPv6, SPF, DKIM and DMARC. Use a tool like mxtoolbox.com to ensure your server's IP is not blacklisted anywhere, and a tool such as mail-tester.com to analyse and report on the email your server sends.
@aran @antekone Yeah, I'm running mine for a few years now and with the big providers (which *know* how to do Email correctly but sometimes deliberately decide to fuck things up) I never had an issue. Its medium to large company's sysadmins which apparently don't know that services other than their domain and the big webmail providers exist. Even worse, I've got my MX on a subdomain (with is.currently.online, that's a must :D).
@antekone it also blocks sometimes legit emails from Debian without any reason given. not nice :(
@cm @antekone Speaking of GMail's IPv6 support: even with perfectly configured IPv6 FCrDNS, DMARC, SPF, DKIM, ADSP, etc., Google keeps randomly rejecting e-mail sent using IPv6. Only option: force all outbound e-mail aimed at Google to be sent to a hard-coded IPv4 GMail inbound relay, overriding their DNS. Very clean & convenient... 😕
@antekone The problem with the email service provider market is that people choose their one provider for life. It takes too much time to change hundreds of online (and offline) accounts that have the old address. Most people don’t have a record of who has their email address so they don’t even know who and what needs their new address. This protocol-level vendor lock-in allows for unchallanged abusive policies and hurts competition.
@antekone Longer-from reply at https://www.ctrl.blog/entry/email-identity-provider.html
@antekone I agree with you on most points but "pretty much impossible" does not fully match my experience. I manage my own SMTP server and I interact with Gmail people.
@antekone I completely agree! Consider dropping GMail in favor of some smaller provider (not Yahoo or the likes) - there are many remaining and doing a great job in keeping the Internet as open as they can.
Yes, definitely. You should drop it.
@antekone Google provides the dominant service in a number of areas now and shows in all of those areas that if you dominate the market you don't need to provide good service. In many cases the main feature they provide over the competition is unlimited space.
@antekone gmail should have stayed garfield mail
@antekone Bonus, almost everyone bulk drops any "residential" IP.
Drop Gmail. Only use for the account here is for login authentication on Google -powned essential infrastructure. The ASB Bank, for example, now insists on a Google account for NFC payments.
If I could, I'd use gmail only to receive email from people i consider likely to send me spam or for websites that require you to have a valid email to sign up but don't want emails from.
@antekone did that yrs ago.
@antekone I switched to Fastmail, but I get spam in my inbox every day now :(.
@antekone is go so far as to say that Gmail isn’t Internet email, and I suspect that their system isn’t even SMTP standards compliant (though I haven’t had a chance to prove that yet).
It’s like any myriad of old proprietary email systems (AOL, Compuserve, etc.), and you’re right, it’s making its users more and more undeliverable.
@antekone Well, I turned that horse around: my mail server auto-responds to mails from Gmail, telling the sender that I won't (and that they should get themselves a "real mail provider" that respects the privacy of their correspondents).
That's the attitude. 🙂
I do that when people send me links to #Dropbox or crap like that.
“Dear X, Your link doesn't work, please upload your files to https://mynextcloudinstallation.example.com/upload” (where /upload is a redirect to a shared directory configured as a file drop).
Let me say, in my smuggiest voice:
@antekone outlook.com has similar issues. It blocks whole IP ranges (e.g. the whole Hetzner IP space) and drops or bounces mails from there (sometimes even silenty).
@antekone Goog seems to put emails from SDF accts in to spam now.
This problem is bigger then most realize. Tons of companies now outsource their email to goog (or outlook) because they get tired of fighting to say off blacklists. Just because it isn't "@gmail.com" doesn't mean it isn't powered by Gmail. You can get yourdoamin.com powered by gmail.
Goog & Outlook.com basically run a protection racket today. Hire them for your email hosting or risk having your domain labeled as spam. 😡
"Consider dropping GMail." 👍🏻👍🏻👍🏻
@antekone this happened to me when using Mailbox.org with custom domain. My mails were considered by spam by Gmail recipients.
I managed to solve this with proper SFP and DKIM configuration.
@antekone I eventually want to move to a different mail provider, maybe s9mething like mail.com which is end to end encrypted...
@antekone it's increasingly seeing more adoption among corporates. For commoners, there's nothing better than free
This seems a bit hyperbolic. Gmail isn't the reason that self-hosted email servers are increasingly difficult to manage. Spammers and the necessary security responses to them are the reason why most people can't keep up.
@antekone ok but how am I supposed to use a youtube account without it? I mean, I don't primarily use gmail but it's kinda hard to live without google, you know?
don't get me wrong, I'd prefer Google to be abolished all together, or at least have its business model be different, and make its products actually be GPL open source, but that ain't happening any time soon, and for now, Google controls a lot of our lives, and there are no alternatives
@miro @antekone Don't use a Youtube account at all because it's only here to spy on you.You can watch all videos without a account,or even better using a Invidious instance like https://invidious.kabi.tk where you can register for a local,independent account which has features like subscriptions without needing a Google account.You can watch all videos without ads and tracking there.Need alternatives for other Google shit?Just ask me,I know them all!
@miro @antekone You can't watch ads with Invidious and you shouldn't because most of the money goes to Google and they should become poor 😛 You can't upload videos on Invidious because that's only allowed with a Google account but you can upload your own videos to PeerTube,a open source and federated video platform.Have a look at https://devtube.dev-wiki.de (I'm mod there btw)
@antekone The Google argument would be: "if everyone just used Gmail, this wouldn't be a problem."
I'm with you on this, but a couple of thoughts: 1) is this also a problem with G Suite email? and 2) What are the best alternatives to Gmail in your opinion and based on what criteria?
@antekone All links are changed to tracked ones as well.
@antekone Protonmail is a good alternative.
The social network of the future: No ads, no corporate surveillance, ethical design, and decentralization! Own your data with Mastodon!