*ad portas of civil war* @[email protected]
- I am not here
- Just DM if you need
- likes
- anime, manga, poetry, photos, readings
- Pol/Ec
- Libertarian/Austrian School
- Religion
- Atheist
currently on @astheroth
Having this account active just for dm
🇨🇱 #chile
Joined Apr 2019
Pinned toot
☠️Húsares de la Muerte☠️
The Húsares de la Muerte (Hussars of Death) was a lightweight cavalry regiment founded after the great defeat of the Chilean Independence Forces in 1814.
Manuel Rodriguez, young lawyer, decided to form a guerrilla group, recruiting folk people to make counterintelligence tasks and bringing that information to the now hidden Chilean Generals.
Rodriguez was crucial to allow that the Chilean Army defeated the Royalist Army in !818.
#chile #history #independence
Pinned toot
Pinned toot
#Introductions
On the fediverse since 2014 -before mastodon exists
Farmer- I like nature. Former Firefighter on the Great Chilean Wildfire Season 2016-2017
Mostly Floss User since 2009
Anime/Manga Watcher/Reader
Tolkien Fan Since 10 years old when I read the Silmarillion.
I write poems. Sometimes I put them here.
I mostly post on English, but for obviously reasons Spanish is my mother lang
Political views: Ancap
Personality: INFJ
Quote: *When you stare the Abyss, the Abyss stares back at you.*
Pinned toot
*ad portas of civil war*
boosted
*ad portas of civil war*
boosted
duck it and duck it good~
*ad portas of civil war*
boosted
Retoot if you are actually stupid
*ad portas of civil war*
boosted
@aven @astheroth Ha, did this post take a while to federate?
You're correct:
> The principle is often defined in one of two versions: the strong hypothesis, which was held by some of the early linguists before World War II,[1] and the weak hypothesis, mostly held by some of the modern linguists.[1]
But back around the time of the comment, that paragraph read:
> There is controversy whether this a scientific hypothesis or more of a political notion.[2] During World War II this claimed principal was used to advance nationalistic views by Nazi Germany, claiming their intellectual superiority over others[3], but has been reexamined by scholars since the late 1980's and on, without the context of racism, nationalism or a hierarchy of intellectual capabilities.[4]
You're correct:
> The principle is often defined in one of two versions: the strong hypothesis, which was held by some of the early linguists before World War II,[1] and the weak hypothesis, mostly held by some of the modern linguists.[1]
But back around the time of the comment, that paragraph read:
> There is controversy whether this a scientific hypothesis or more of a political notion.[2] During World War II this claimed principal was used to advance nationalistic views by Nazi Germany, claiming their intellectual superiority over others[3], but has been reexamined by scholars since the late 1980's and on, without the context of racism, nationalism or a hierarchy of intellectual capabilities.[4]
*ad portas of civil war*
boosted
@aven @astheroth Ha, I had no idea that Sapir-Whorf was so beloved by the literal Nazis.
It's a feedback loop, Sapir-Whorf is half the picture; the next iteration of thoughts affects the next iteration of the language, and it's not quite as clear-cut. (The distinction between articulated/articulatable knowledge is also important.) I would have comments on this but I think you about summed it up.
But I don't think the rank-and-file screeching communist types you interact with usually think of that kind of thing, but language is a tribal signifier so people identify with that tribe and those terms and their exact definitions get really important to them.
It's a feedback loop, Sapir-Whorf is half the picture; the next iteration of thoughts affects the next iteration of the language, and it's not quite as clear-cut. (The distinction between articulated/articulatable knowledge is also important.) I would have comments on this but I think you about summed it up.
But I don't think the rank-and-file screeching communist types you interact with usually think of that kind of thing, but language is a tribal signifier so people identify with that tribe and those terms and their exact definitions get really important to them.
It seems that freespeechextremist is having some trouble
@angristan pls fix the federation u-u
*ad portas of civil war*
boosted
December 2nd
2200
*ad portas of civil war*
boosted
*ad portas of civil war*
boosted
@astheroth I'm up!
Oki, the first civilian has shot to the an-comms
Meanwhile in pland
Oh, no!
THE DB SERVER DISAPPEARED.
(2019-11-10 12:29 PST) I do not know of a reason the DB server would disappear. Looking into it now. Looks like it happened late last night.
*ad portas of civil war*
boosted
>If you see this, either we're updating or something's busted. Unless I put something more specific here, probably busted.
hey @p get up!
- I am not here
- Just DM if you need
- likes
- anime, manga, poetry, photos, readings
- Pol/Ec
- Libertarian/Austrian School
- Religion
- Atheist
currently on @astheroth
Having this account active just for dm
🇨🇱 #chile
Joined Apr 2019
