Due to the extensive peer-review process, Wikipedia is probably more reliable and comprehensive than any single official source.
@codewiz did you say Wikipedia is reliable and comprehensive?
@EdwardTorvalds well, *more* reliable and comprehensive than other sources.
@EdwardTorvalds well, I guess the WHO website is a good aggregator, but I wouldn't trust official numbers from governments without some cross-checking.
The social network of the future: No ads, no corporate surveillance, ethical design, and decentralization! Own your data with Mastodon!