@rugk Yes, this should be opt-in and it should clearly say that all of your browsing history is sent to that company.
@jomo So... anyone tried Vivaldi recently?
@jomo are you fucking kidding me? I just started using firefox again after palemoon started having too many issues :/
@jomo @maunzikation
> 2017
> still running BonziBuddy
@jomo but hey at least the code is open-source 🙄😒
@jomo Wtf indeed
@jomo um what. thi combined with the fact that firefox has been crashing every 10 minutes for the last few days makes me strongly consider switching
@jomo ok. time to say goodbye to mozilla.
Any recomidations for browser?
@rugk @paulfree14 I think it's a reasonable response, no matter if it's one or all users. They can't seriously stand for privacy while sending browsing history to a private company without informing their users.
@paulfree14 @jomo @rugk
when it's just one department I'm awaiting their response. If they just take the pill, mozilla is lost for me.
...and shure better then google, but still funded by them for obeying to their marketing department.
@jomo Oh HELL no.
It doesn't look horrible but not something that should really be bundled with firefox?
@Elizafox It comes as a pre-installed extension (which can be removed)
@jomo I think it should at least ask you on installation.
@jomo “no surprises. That’s why we’re telling you about this today”. Since you know everyone reads the fucking Mozilla blog religiously
@jomo @KnowPresent I think cliqz is doing it right and they are under the control of a law and a DPA in Munich. No profile, no IP... What's your concern?
@rigo @jomo I suspect you are trolling but I will give you the benefit of doubt:
1. "anonymized" data can be de-anonymized. Many cases of this.
2. DPA has done little to modify egregious tracking and sloppy security of big data companies operating in germany (FB, Yahoo, Google, etc.)
3. Most importantly, for me, I expect Mozilla, a bulwark for democracy and security on the net, to not get involved with slimy surveillance capitalists!