@sjb I suppose he didn't write that equation out? Looks like something spat out by Maple.

I don't really get what the major breakthrough is? They had an iterative solution previously. Why wasn''t that sufficient to calculate the lens shape to arbitrary levels of precision?

@jhol Yeah for all practical purposes the numerical integration should be fine. The analytic form is neat though (in the paper it's presented using intermediate variables and all the 8-10 equations are normal-sized)

Sign in to participate in the conversation
Mastodon

mstdn.io is one of the instance in the fediverse. We're an open-minded generalistic instance. Learn more here!