@inference @norm Which one (if any) of the messengers is considered to be secure at the moment? I signed up for Signal a while ago
@inference @norm Thanks! I saw some articles questioning certain things behind-the-scenes with Signal a few months back (can't find them now, maybe a red herring)
@inference @norm Sounds good. Nah it wasn't crypto, I just dug out the article that worried me:
https://securityaffairs.co/wordpress/114551/mobile-2/fbi-access-private-signal-messages.html
@inference @norm OK thanks that's good to know.
Yes, reading messages off the phone's screen doesn't count as breaking encryption 😀
@[email protected] @[email protected]
Side note: Signal is planning on switching to usernames instead of phone numbers.
Awesome if they do, the phone number thin has been the biggest thing that has shied me away from Signal until now.
The following have sound and provably secure (and reasonably private) protocols:
- Signal
- Matrix
- XMPP
The following also hide all metadata:
- Briar
- Session
Unless you *need* the metadata privacy, you may want to consider using messengers in the first section, because they have verify abilities to reduce the chance of a MITM.
Best one, by far, if you don't mind the phone number issue, is Signal; it's the gold standard.