@inference @norm Which one (if any) of the messengers is considered to be secure at the moment? I signed up for Signal a while ago
@inference @norm Thanks! I saw some articles questioning certain things behind-the-scenes with Signal a few months back (can't find them now, maybe a red herring)
@inference @norm Sounds good. Nah it wasn't crypto, I just dug out the article that worried me:
https://securityaffairs.co/wordpress/114551/mobile-2/fbi-access-private-signal-messages.html
@inference @norm OK thanks that's good to know.
Yes, reading messages off the phone's screen doesn't count as breaking encryption 😀
@[email protected] @[email protected]
Side note: Signal is planning on switching to usernames instead of phone numbers.
Awesome if they do, the phone number thin has been the biggest thing that has shied me away from Signal until now.
That's an issue of its own, but it doesn't affect the messenger use case of Signal. A lot of other protocols are based on Signal protocol, including Wire and WhatsApp.
Signal protocol gives cryptographic deniability, perfect forward secrecy via regenerating keys every message/every few messages, verifiability, and uses gold standard ciphers and authentication (AES etc), as well as using a double ratchet algorithm.
Side note: Signal is planning on switching to usernames instead of phone numbers.