Recent searches
Search options
Administered by:
For the Signal enthusiasts in your life :)
Use Molly instead: https://molly.im/
It's probably just as bad, but at least it's truly open source!
@djsumdog
Prove it
@djsumdog I've seen all those before. FUD propaganda BS by hack "journalists"
Let me ask you this: Signal requires a massive amount of resources and handles SMS nations across multiple nations (I have friends in NZ and AU who use it). That ain't cheap. If governments and three letter agencies aren't funding it, then where the hell is it getting its money from?
A literal US intelligence agent working in digital censorship now chairs their board. Even if they weren't always compromised, they certainly are now.
https://www.city-journal.org/article/signals-katherine-maher-problem
@nicholas @djsumdog it's like saying because one employee at our natural health food store worked for a Burger King 10 years ago when they were in high school, that means all the healthy stuff doesn't work.
Utterly absurd the lengths that people go to denigrate good tech as opposed to what? The security joke that is Telegram‽
You ask for proof, and we give you proof and then you said, "your proof is bullshit," and you're obviously refusing to read it.
it's like saying because one employee at our natural health food store worked for a Burger King 10 years
It's literally the opposite of that. It's like the CTO of Burger Kang taking a job as the CFO of McDonalds. Katherine Maher isn't a low ranking cashier. She's a high ranking, c-suite, decision making person who's been at Mozilla, Wikipedia and NPR .. a government invested spooky piece of shit.
You do not care about finding out the truth. You have an idea in your head and you have dismissed everything that contradicts your own narrative story. You are a religious follower of the Church of Signal.
And I've made it clear, I think Signal is likely secure (I could be wrong) due to the 3rd party researchers who've tore it apart for fun and open source projects like Molly. But just like TOR, it's in government interests to make secure encrypted public projects like this because the general public is now using a service they can hide clandestine operations behind.
So it can be both secure/useful AND a government tool. Both work in this situation.
@djsumdog they get their money from a $50 million grant from Brian Acton and donations. They've been very open and published all their financials if you just look it up.