Back

@hunger @argv_minus_one @puppygirlhornypost2 @pancake
Also, your logic is circular:

you want me to show you an architecture not supported by LLVM that is not "only of historical interest" while you define "only of historical interest" as "the vendor hasn't added LLVM support".

So you're asking for an architecture not supported by LLVM that isn't not supported by LLVM.